Robert Spencer

887 citations
44 papers · 666 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Spencer

38 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Robert Spencer
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • General Health Professions 246
  • Ecological Modeling 43
  • Parasitology 46
  • Ecology 185
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 57
Replace Gordon McLachlan with:
Gordon McLachlan South Africa
Carsten Riis Olesen Denmark
Vincent Brodeur Canada
Keith E. Evans Australia
Marta Tufet United Kingdom
Isaac M. Ortega United States
Duncan Gillespie United Kingdom
Charlotte Taylor Australia
Richard H. Kahn United States
Kathy Fletcher United Kingdom
Robert Spencer relative to Gordon McLachlan South Africa Gordon McLachlan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Gordon McLachlan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Spencer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Spencer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Spencer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Spencer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Spencer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Spencer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Spencer. The network helps show where Robert Spencer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Spencer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Spencer Line = papers co-authored together Robert Spencer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994286
2 197498
3 198623
4 201222
5 202221
6
The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (And the Crusades)
200519
7 198216
8 197515
9 198714
10 198214
11 201613
12 201913
13 197910
14 20179
15 19809
16
Religion of Peace?: Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn't
20079
17 19778
18 19788
19 19756
20 19766

About Robert Spencer

Robert Spencer is a scholar working on Ecology, Sociology and Political Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 44 papers that have together received 666 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (246 citations), Ecological Modeling (43 citations), Parasitology (46 citations), Ecology (185 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (57 citations). Robert Spencer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Robert Hudson, Jonathan R. Hibbs, Daniel Fife, Mark Broom, Anita M. Collins, Thomas E. Rinderer, Thomas E. Dickins, José D. Villa, Andy Crabtree and Andrea Oskis. Their work appears in journals such as Bird Study, Apidologie, Dynamic Games and Applications, Psychology of Popular Media and Journal of Evolutionary Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact