Robert Slaughter

18 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

Robert Slaughter
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Applied Psychology 58
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
  • General Health Professions 190
  • Health 38
  • Emergency Medicine 36
Replace Allison A. Lewinski with:
Allison A. Lewinski United States
Michael Sánchez United States
Anna Collard United Kingdom
Eva Serhal Canada
James M. Galliher United States
Ana María Rodríguez Canada
Paul Lupinacci United States
Scott C. Cook United States
Mona AuYoung United States
Willa M. Doswell United States
Robert Slaughter relative to Allison A. Lewinski United States Allison A. Lewinski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Allison A. Lewinski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Slaughter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Slaughter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Slaughter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Slaughter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Slaughter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Slaughter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Slaughter. The network helps show where Robert Slaughter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Slaughter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Slaughter Line = papers co-authored together Robert Slaughter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2010146
2 2003121
3 199959
4 197658
5 200543
6 198141
7 199732
8 200425
9 200322
10 197619
11 201114
12 200012
13 199911
14 19926
15
Pilot study of an online dyspnea self-management program for COPD.
20033
16 19762
17
Statistical Procedures for Identifying Possible Sources of Item Bias Based on [Chi-Squared] Statistics.
19811
18 20031

About Robert Slaughter

Robert Slaughter is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (2 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (58 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations), General Health Professions (190 citations), Health (38 citations) and Emergency Medicine (36 citations). Robert Slaughter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Stulbarg, Sally H. Rankin, Virginia Carrieri‐Kohlman, Roy D. Goldman, Huong Q. Nguyen, Thierry Jahan, Won Ju Hwang, Janine K. Cataldo, Suzanne Bakken Henry and Leonard A. Marascuilo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Educational Measurement, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Computers in Biology and Medicine and Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact