Robert R. Moss

1.8k citations
16 papers · 1.1k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Robert R. Moss

16 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Robert R. Moss
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 977
  • Epidemiology 489
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 171
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 158
  • Surgery 156
Replace Mélanie Freeman with:
Mélanie Freeman Canada
Helen Rimington United Kingdom
Steven C. Cassidy United States
L. Zannini Italy
P. Meimoun France
T. Buck Germany
Elaine Tang United States
Björn Peters Germany
Alison Knauth United States
Pratik Manandhar United States
Robert R. Moss relative to Mélanie Freeman Canada Mélanie Freeman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mélanie Freeman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert R. Moss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert R. Moss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert R. Moss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert R. Moss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert R. Moss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert R. Moss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert R. Moss. The network helps show where Robert R. Moss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert R. Moss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert R. Moss Line = papers co-authored together Robert R. Moss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2012230
2 2008170
3 2015120
4 201596
5 201091
6 200384
7 201278
8 200870
9 201036
10 200727
11 201520
12 201313
13 200612
14 20073
15 20082
16
Contractile reserve induced with dobutamine echocardiography predicts outcome in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and mitral regurgitation.
20141

About Robert R. Moss

Robert R. Moss is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics and Neurology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (12 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (1 paper), Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (1 paper), Pericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade (1 paper), Vascular Anomalies and Treatments (1 paper), Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (977 citations), Epidemiology (489 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (171 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (158 citations) and Surgery (156 citations). Robert R. Moss has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include John G. Webb, Christopher Thompson, Brad Munt, Karin H. Humphries, Jian Ye, Anson Cheung, David Wood, Mélanie Freeman, Stefan Toggweiler and Jonathon Leipsic. Their work appears in journals such as JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, Circulation, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging and Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact