Robert Prince

665 citations
33 papers · 474 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Prince

29 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

Robert Prince
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 145
  • General Psychology 11
  • Clinical Psychology 122
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 77
  • Environmental Engineering 60
Replace Josh B. Kazman with:
Josh B. Kazman United States
Margareta Torgén Sweden
Francis Derriennic France
Helena Moreira Portugal
Greg Finlayson Canada
Çağatay Güler Türkiye
Seeta Durvasula Australia
Fei Qin China
Elena Andrade Spain
Julie Bodin France
Robert Prince relative to Josh B. Kazman United States Josh B. Kazman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Josh B. Kazman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Prince

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Prince's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Prince with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Prince more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Prince

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Prince. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Prince. The network helps show where Robert Prince may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Robert Prince, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Prince Line = papers co-authored together Robert Prince links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995139
2 201494
3 201946
4
Second generation effects of historical trauma.
198525
5 198925
6 200923
7 199114
8 200213
9
The legacy of the Holocaust : psychohistorical themes in the second generation
199911
10 20099
11 20157
12 20157
13 19856
14 20186
15 19736
16 20185
17 19855
18 19805
19 20184
20 19854

About Robert Prince

Robert Prince is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, General Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (2 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers) and Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (145 citations), General Psychology (11 citations), Clinical Psychology (122 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (77 citations) and Environmental Engineering (60 citations). Robert Prince has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Judith W. Smith, Thomas J. Moore, Dong Chen, Marcus Thatcher, Anthony G. Kachenko, Guy Barnett, Xiaoming Wang, Daniel Guss, Christopher W. DiGiovanni and Bart Lubberts. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoanalytic Inquiry, Journal of Personality Disorders, Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Foot & Ankle International and Environmental Pollution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact