Robert Porter
Impact in
-
- Renaissance Literature and Culture
- Medieval Literature and History
Papers in
In The Last Decade
Robert Porter
1 paper receiving 1 citation
Peers
Comparison fields: 1 of 1
- Classics 1
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Porter
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Porter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Porter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Porter. The network helps show where Robert Porter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Robert Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1980 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 0 |
About Robert Porter
Robert Porter is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry, Surgery, Communication and Small Animals, having authored 3 papers that have together received 2 indexed citations. The work is most often cited by research in Classics (1 citation), Infectious Diseases (0 citations), Organic Chemistry (0 citations), Surgery (0 citations) and Communication (0 citations). Frequent co-authors include William E. Harkins and Robert Russell. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review and World Literature Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.