Róbert Pintér

67 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Róbert Pintér
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Computer Science Applications 81
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 231
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 238
  • Computer Networks and Communications 265
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 107
Replace Hideyuki Suzuki with:
Hideyuki Suzuki Japan
Saket Navlakha United States
D. Stott Parker United States
Charles Blundell United Kingdom
Claudio Mattiussi Switzerland
Pentti Kanerva United States
Sharon Crook United States
Inman Harvey United Kingdom
Jeff Hawkins United States
Ari S. Morcos United States
Róbert Pintér relative to Hideyuki Suzuki Japan Hideyuki Suzuki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hideyuki Suzuki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Róbert Pintér

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Róbert Pintér's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Róbert Pintér with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Róbert Pintér more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Róbert Pintér

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Róbert Pintér. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Róbert Pintér. The network helps show where Róbert Pintér may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Róbert Pintér, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Róbert Pintér Line = papers co-authored together Róbert Pintér links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993140
2 201585
3 199166
4 199159
5 196657
6 197244
7 196134
8 198130
9 201129
10 199025
11 197925
12 200525
13 199023
14 199823
15 198423
16 197723
17 200721
18 198320
19 198320
20 201518

About Róbert Pintér

Róbert Pintér is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (14 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (12 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (8 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (7 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (6 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (5 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (81 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (231 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (238 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (265 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (107 citations). Róbert Pintér has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Serbia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Abdesselam Bouzerdoum, Sanja Maravić Čisar, Bahram Nabet, Daniele Toninelli, Dragica Radosav, A. O. Dennis Willows, Kenneth J. Lohmann, Daniel Osorio, Laurence R. Harris and Jens Muehlsteff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Theoretical Biology, Journal of Experimental Biology, Neural Networks, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica and Computers & Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact