Robert P. King

113 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Robert P. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 357
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 55
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 315
  • Soil Science 274
  • Business and International Management 42
Replace James Turner with:
James Turner New Zealand
Philip Jones United Kingdom
J. de Boer Netherlands
Cristina Suárez Spain
Graham Brookes United Kingdom
Garth Holloway United Kingdom
Nicole Olynk Widmar United States
Robert Hoppe Netherlands
Keith H. Coble United States
John Holmes Australia
Robert P. King relative to James Turner New Zealand James Turner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James Turner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert P. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert P. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert P. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert P. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert P. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert P. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert P. King. The network helps show where Robert P. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert P. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert P. King Line = papers co-authored together Robert P. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010342
2 1981106
3 199492
4 201175
5 199073
6 198672
7 201066
8 199160
9 198459
10 199644
11 200944
12 197842
13 199642
14 201040
15 199639
16 198337
17 201136
18 198834
19 201634
20 199632

About Robert P. King

Robert P. King is a scholar working on Plant Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 121 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (14 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (12 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (10 papers), Cooperative Studies and Economics (10 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (9 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (9 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (9 papers) and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (357 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (55 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (315 citations), Soil Science (274 citations) and Business and International Management (42 citations). Robert P. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mark R. Dennis, Scott M. Swinton, Kevin O’Holleran, Miles J. Padgett, Donald W. Lybecker, B. Jack, Edward E. Schweizer, Lindon J. Robison, Frank Forcella and Paul L. Fackler. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Weed Science, Agribusiness, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology and Agricultural Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact