Robert Möckel
Impact in
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 2%
- Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
- Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Geophysics top 10%
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Papers in
-
- Mineralogy and Gemology Studies 11
- Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis 10
- Geophysics 11
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis 11
- Co-authors
- Jens Götze (14 shared papers)Richard Gloaguen (10 shared papers)Sandra Lorenz (7 shared papers)Robert Zimmermann (5 shared papers)Martin Rudolph (8 shared papers)Laura Tuşa (5 shared papers)Moritz Kirsch (5 shared papers)Jens Gutzmer (9 shared papers)
- Journals
- Minerals Engineering (6 papers)Remote Sensing (3 papers)Journal of Crystal Growth (2 papers)Geochemistry (2 papers)Ore Geology Reviews (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyCanadaSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Robert Möckel
55 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Geochemistry and Petrology 284
- Geophysics 242
- Water Science and Technology 171
- Media Technology 79
- Pollution 85
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Möckel
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Möckel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Möckel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Möckel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Möckel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Möckel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Möckel. The network helps show where Robert Möckel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Möckel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 219 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 117 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 95 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 71 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 69 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 64 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 54 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 52 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 44 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 24 |
About Robert Möckel
Robert Möckel is a scholar working on Geochemistry and Petrology, Geophysics, Mechanical Engineering, Water Science and Technology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Extraction and Separation Processes (12 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (11 papers), Mineralogy and Gemology Studies (11 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (10 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (7 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (7 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (5 papers) and Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (284 citations), Geophysics (242 citations), Water Science and Technology (171 citations), Media Technology (79 citations) and Pollution (85 citations). Robert Möckel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Jens Götze, Richard Gloaguen, Sandra Lorenz, Robert Zimmermann, Martin Rudolph, Laura Tuşa, Moritz Kirsch, Jens Gutzmer, Yuanming Pan and Urs Alexander Peuker. Their work appears in journals such as Minerals Engineering, Remote Sensing, Journal of Crystal Growth, Geochemistry and Ore Geology Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.