Robert M. Page

46 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers

Robert M. Page
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Public Administration 28
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 106
  • Plant Science 178
  • Political Science and International Relations 100
  • Pharmacology 68
Replace Robert Shaffer with:
Robert Shaffer United States
Fred Robinson United Kingdom
Richard Craig United States
Phil Lewis Australia
Eduardo Valenzuela Chile
D. T. Herbert United Kingdom
Peter Lloyd United Kingdom
Erika Gubrium Norway
Stephen Garton Australia
Miles Taylor United Kingdom
Robert M. Page relative to Robert Shaffer United States Robert Shaffer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Robert Shaffer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Page

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Page's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Page with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Page more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Page

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Page. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Page. The network helps show where Robert M. Page may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Page, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. Page Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. Page links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199898
2 196239
3 195238
4 195637
5 196625
6 196024
7 195624
8 196423
9 200820
10 196019
11 199918
12
Revisiting the Welfare State
200718
13
Altruism and the British welfare state
199618
14 195217
15 195917
16
Modern Thinkers on Welfare
199517
17
Understanding social problems : issues in social policy
200113
18 200612
19 197311
20
Global social problems
200410

About Robert M. Page

Robert M. Page is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Sociology and Political Science and Oceanography, having authored 51 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (12 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (12 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (4 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (4 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Growth and nutrition in plants (2 papers), Diatoms and Algae Research (2 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (28 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (106 citations), Plant Science (178 citations), Political Science and International Relations (100 citations) and Pharmacology (68 citations). Robert M. Page has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard Silburn, Angela E. Johnson, Jeanette Hofmann, Kevin Morgan, Victor George, R.J. Neale, Angela Donkin, George M. Curry, Richard A. Humber and Donald Kennedy. Their work appears in journals such as Mycologia, American Journal of Botany, Science, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice and Critical Social Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact