Robert M. Harper

2.0k citations
41 papers · 1.7k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Robert M. Harper

38 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Robert M. Harper
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.2k
  • Geophysics 520
  • Atmospheric Science 475
  • Oceanography 267
  • Geology 88
Replace Steven Soter with:
Steven Soter United States
Herbert Frey United States
Mark Settle United States
T. W. Thompson United States
J. Arkani‐Hamed Canada
Gary V. Latham United States
Eugene M. Shoemaker United States
E. M. Shoemaker United States
Michael E. Purucker United States
J. M. Torta Spain
Robert M. Harper relative to Steven Soter United States Steven Soter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Steven Soter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Harper. The network helps show where Robert M. Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Harper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. Harper Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. Harper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992197
2 1973167
3 1977101
4 197395
5 199294
6 197690
7 198778
8 197869
9 197967
10 197756
11 197651
12 198049
13 197944
14 198042
15 197240
16 198238
17 197737
18 198137
19 197836
20 197736

About Robert M. Harper

Robert M. Harper is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Geophysics and Accounting, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (29 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (13 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (9 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (6 papers), Earthquake Detection and Analysis (5 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (4 papers), GNSS positioning and interference (3 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.2k citations), Geophysics (520 citations), Atmospheric Science (475 citations), Oceanography (267 citations) and Geology (88 citations). Robert M. Harper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Japan. Frequent co-authors include R. A. Behnke, C.K. Morley, William A. Wescott, R. F. Woodman, William E. Gordon, Susumu Katō, F.M. Karanja, S.T. Wigger, S. Fukao and Jerry R. Strawser. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Radio Science, Planetary and Space Science, Journal of Accounting Education and Geophysical Research Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact