Robert M. Factor

566 citations
18 papers · 434 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Robert M. Factor

18 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

Robert M. Factor
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 88
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 144
  • Social Psychology 99
  • Applied Psychology 22
  • Clinical Psychology 94
Replace Raquel Costa with:
Raquel Costa Spain
Bita Ajilchi Iran
Raquel Nichele de Chaves Portugal
Dana Wyner United States
Steven E. Linnville United States
Johan Simons Belgium
Sara Pereira Portugal
Christophe Maïano France
Kerri L. Staples Canada
K. Mark Sossin United States
Robert M. Factor relative to Raquel Costa Spain Raquel Costa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Raquel Costa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Factor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Factor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Factor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Factor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Factor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Factor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Factor. The network helps show where Robert M. Factor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Factor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. Factor Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. Factor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2010241
2 197337
3 201534
4 198822
5 198919
6 197117
7 199415
8 19909
9 19887
10 19936
11 19885
12 20085
13 19914
14 20134
15
A psychotherapeutic approach to task-oriented groups of severely ill patients.
19854
16 19712
17 19862
18 20191

About Robert M. Factor

Robert M. Factor is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 18 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (88 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (144 citations), Social Psychology (99 citations), Applied Psychology (22 citations) and Clinical Psychology (94 citations). Robert M. Factor has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Claudia L. Reardon, Ingrid Waldron, Ronald J. Diamond, Leonard I. Stein, Jacqueline V. Lerner, William H. Wilson, Charles R. Goldman, H. Richard Lamb, Kenneth Minkoff and Harriet P. Lefley. Their work appears in journals such as Community Mental Health Journal, Psychiatric Services, Nature, Sports Medicine and American Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact