Robert L. Wolf

55 papers receiving 821 citations

Peers

Robert L. Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 210
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 206
  • Biochemistry 67
  • Nephrology 47
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 24
Replace John N. Forrest with:
John N. Forrest United States
Richard L. Malvin United States
Phyllis M. Hartroft United States
Satoru Chiba Japan
Isabel Hernández Spain
Hilmar Stolte Germany
Epstein Fh United States
John W. Boylan United States
Saul J. Färber United States
Jacques A. Dürr United States
Robert L. Wolf relative to John N. Forrest United States John N. Forrest's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
John N. Forrest · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert L. Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert L. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert L. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert L. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert L. Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert L. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert L. Wolf. The network helps show where Robert L. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert L. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert L. Wolf Line = papers co-authored together Robert L. Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006108
2 1960107
3 198364
4
Excretion of catecholamine catabolites by normal children.
196859
5
Treatment of hypertension with spironolactone. Double-blind study.
196648
6 196448
7 196642
8 196040
9 196531
10
Vascular responsiveness in hypertensive and hypotensive states.
196528
11 197026
12 199225
13 196223
14 197118
15 202017
16 196815
17 196315
18 196214
19 196114
20 196414

About Robert L. Wolf

Robert L. Wolf is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology and Pharmacology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 979 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (10 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (9 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers), Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (4 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma (2 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (2 papers) and Urticaria and Related Conditions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (210 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (206 citations), Biochemistry (67 citations), Nephrology (47 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (24 citations). Robert L. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Milton Mendlowitz, Stanley E. Gitlow, Nosrat E. Naftchi, Sherwin Wilk, Elizabeth Wilk, Peter Kornfeld, Julia P. Roboz, C. William Hanke, David A. Dreiling and Hans Pópper. Their work appears in journals such as American Heart Journal, Experimental Biology and Medicine, JAMA, The American Journal of Cardiology and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact