Robert Joly

50 papers receiving 192 citations

Peers

Robert Joly
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Philosophy 37
  • Anthropology 32
  • Archeology 29
  • Plant Science 76
  • Developmental Biology 4
Replace Jon Solomon with:
Jon Solomon United States
Charles Bonnet France
Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur
Georges Roux France
Michael Squire United Kingdom
Christopher T. Ostler United States
Anthony Page Australia
Francis Darwin United Kingdom
Theresa M. Kelley United States
Paolo Parrini Italy
Robert Joly relative to Jon Solomon United States Jon Solomon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Jon Solomon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Joly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Joly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Joly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Joly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Joly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Joly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Joly. The network helps show where Robert Joly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Robert Joly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Joly Line = papers co-authored together Robert Joly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200479
2 198213
3
[Determination of extracellular fluid volume in humans by measurement of total body impedance].
19709
4 19709
5
Recherches sur le traité pseudo-hippocratique du régime
19608
6 19618
7
Hippocrate du regime
19847
8 19597
9 19666
10 19775
11
Endocrinology of myriapods.
19885
12
La biologie d'Aristote
19684
13 19684
14 19563
15 19553
16 19763
17 19673
18 19613
19 19643
20
Pier Vincenzo Cova, Lo stoico imperfetto. Un' immagine minore dell'uomo nella letteratura latina del principato
19792

About Robert Joly

Robert Joly is a scholar working on Philosophy, Anthropology, Archeology, History and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 82 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (16 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (11 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (11 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (6 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (6 papers), Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (6 papers) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (37 citations), Anthropology (32 citations), Archeology (29 citations), Plant Science (76 citations) and Developmental Biology (4 citations). Robert Joly has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Ulanov, Tanya M. Quist, Hans J. Bohnert, Shisong Ma, Louis Lefebvre, M. Descamps, J. Lenoir, P Jungers, R. Bucourt and Wesley D. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as General and Comparative Endocrinology, The Classical World, Vigiliae Christianae, Revue belge de philologie et d histoire and Revue des Études Grecques.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact