Robert John Jacobs

92 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Robert John Jacobs
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 180
  • Ophthalmology 320
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 498
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 410
  • Epidemiology 466
Replace Aimee Teo Broman with:
Aimee Teo Broman United States
Erik Moberg Sweden
Terry A. Cox United States
Yair Morad Israel
Judith N. Wagner Germany
Robert Robinson United Kingdom
Ruth B. Loewenson United States
Sachin Kedar United States
Mitesh Patel United Kingdom
Stefano Di Girolamo Italy
Robert John Jacobs relative to Aimee Teo Broman United States Aimee Teo Broman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.6×
Aimee Teo Broman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert John Jacobs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert John Jacobs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert John Jacobs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert John Jacobs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert John Jacobs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert John Jacobs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert John Jacobs. The network helps show where Robert John Jacobs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert John Jacobs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert John Jacobs Line = papers co-authored together Robert John Jacobs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005298
2 2017285
3 2015280
4 1979165
5 2017152
6 201591
7 201889
8 199474
9 201369
10 201068
11 197962
12 197648
13 198946
14 201244
15 201343
16 198940
17 202239
18 201338
19 201235
20 199933

About Robert John Jacobs

Robert John Jacobs is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Social Psychology and Genetics, having authored 100 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (22 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (11 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (8 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers), Color perception and design (5 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (180 citations), Ophthalmology (320 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (498 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (410 citations) and Epidemiology (466 citations). Robert John Jacobs has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin S. Thompson, Keith Raymond Pine, Nicola S. Anstice, Jane Elizabeth Harding, Nabin Paudel, Brian H. Sloan, Arijit Chakraborty, Trecia Ann Wouldes, Kerse Ngaire and Christopher J. D. McKinlay. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Optometry and Vision Science, Vision Research and Clinical ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact