Robert Herber

1.8k citations
62 papers · 715 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Herber

55 papers receiving 677 citations

Peers

Robert Herber
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 506
  • Ophthalmology 222
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 15
  • Biophysics 5
Replace Fernando Faria-Correia with:
Fernando Faria-Correia Portugal
Jose R. Davila United States
Johannes Steinberg Germany
Glauco Reggiani Mello Brazil
Isabel Oberacher-Velten Germany
William Ayliffe United Kingdom
Philemon K. Huang Singapore
Daniël A. Godefrooij Netherlands
Zia Sultan Pradhan India
Vasyl Druchkiv Germany
Robert Herber relative to Fernando Faria-Correia Portugal Fernando Faria-Correia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Fernando Faria-Correia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Herber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Herber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Herber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Herber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Herber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Herber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Herber. The network helps show where Robert Herber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Herber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Herber Line = papers co-authored together Robert Herber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202171
2 201951
3 202139
4 202332
5 201931
6 202231
7 202329
8 202228
9 202428
10 202126
11 201925
12 202024
13 202223
14 201718
15 201718
16 202018
17 201816
18 201914
19 201812
20 201912

About Robert Herber

Robert Herber is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Statistics and Probability, Biophysics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 62 papers that have together received 715 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (49 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (18 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (2 papers), Vasculitis and related conditions (1 paper), Statistical Methods in Epidemiology (1 paper), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (1 paper) and Ocular Infections and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (506 citations), Ophthalmology (222 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (15 citations) and Biophysics (5 citations). Robert Herber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and China. Frequent co-authors include Lutz E. Pillunat, Frederik Raiskup, Eberhard Spoerl, Janine Lenk, Naim Terai, Lisa Ramm, Riccardo Vinciguerra, Paolo Vinciguerra, Eberhard Spörl and Carl Erb. Their work appears in journals such as Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Cornea, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Journal of Refractive Surgery and Journal of Glaucoma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact