Robert Harr

12.4k citations
2 papers · 10 · h-index 2

Impact in

    • Stuttering Research and Treatment
    • Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
    • High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
    • Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
    • Particle Detector Development and Performance

Papers in

Robert Harr

2 papers receiving 9 citations

Peers

Robert Harr
Comparison fields: 5 of 8
  • Clinical Psychology 7
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 3
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 4
  • Radiation 1
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2
Replace Jack M. Levine with:
Jack M. Levine United States
Nadia Ortiz Switzerland
Olivier Doumy France
A. Oberbeck Germany
J. J. Lozano Bahilo Spain
Alice Binns United States
Oswald Bumke
Louis Maletz United States
W.K. Tay Singapore
Jessie Taft United Kingdom
Robert Harr relative to Jack M. Levine United States Jack M. Levine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jack M. Levine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Harr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Harr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Harr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Harr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Harr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Harr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Harr. The network helps show where Robert Harr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Robert Harr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Harr Line = papers co-authored together Robert Harr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

2 of 2 papers shown
#Work
1 19887
2 20013

About Robert Harr

Robert Harr is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Aerospace Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 2 papers that have together received 10 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle Detector Development and Performance (1 paper), Phonetics and Phonology Research (1 paper), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (1 paper), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (1 paper), Stuttering Research and Treatment (1 paper) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (7 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (3 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (4 citations), Radiation (1 citation) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (2 citations). Robert Harr has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Michael P. Rastatter, V. Eiges, L. Laptin, S. Nam, P. E. Karchin, M. Titov, Yu. Gilitsky, I. Tichomirov, J.-G. Shiu and S. Takach. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Fluency Disorders and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact