Robert H. March

1.7k citations
58 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Robert H. March

52 papers receiving 856 citations

Peers

Robert H. March
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 196
  • History and Philosophy of Science 63
  • Condensed Matter Physics 137
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 301
  • Geophysics 104
Replace R. Bowers with:
R. Bowers United States
Melba Phillips United States
Richard L. Garwin United States
Charles H. Holbrow United States
Mendel Sachs United States
Donald G. Fleming Canada
Samuel Devons United States
George L. Trigg United States
P Landsberg United Kingdom
David L. Goodstein United States
Robert H. March relative to R. Bowers United States R. Bowers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
R. Bowers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert H. March

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert H. March's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert H. March with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert H. March more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert H. March

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert H. March. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert H. March. The network helps show where Robert H. March may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert H. March, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert H. March Line = papers co-authored together Robert H. March links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1962256
2 197980
3 199956
4 196951
5 199748
6 196935
7 196327
8 197727
9 197126
10 198125
11 196225
12 196324
13 196822
14 196122
15
Physics for Poets
197019
16 199818
17 196618
18 199018
19 198717
20 196216

About Robert H. March

Robert H. March is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Materials Chemistry and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (7 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (7 papers), Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (4 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (4 papers), Muon and positron interactions and applications (3 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (3 papers), Computational Physics and Python Applications (2 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (196 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (63 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (137 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (301 citations) and Geophysics (104 citations). Robert H. March has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include A. D. B. Woods, B. N. Brockhouse, R. Bowers, Audrey Stewart, Gary Zukav, B. L. Blackford, Jessica Wang, A. T. Stewart, R. A. Dunlap and M. H. Jericho. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Today, Physical Review Letters, Science, Applied Physics Letters and Physics in Perspective.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact