Robert H. Archer

631 citations
34 papers · 491 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Robert H. Archer

32 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers

Robert H. Archer
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 307
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 107
  • Forestry 30
  • Plant Science 182
  • Molecular Biology 304
Replace Christian Puff with:
Christian Puff Austria
L. E. Newton Kenya
Patricia M. Tilney South Africa
J. C. Lindeman Netherlands
P.M. Tilney South Africa
J. Koek‐Noorman Netherlands
Suk‐Pyo Hong South Korea
Pan Kai-Yu China
Marcel Eurlings Netherlands
Tatiane Maria Rodrigues Brazil
Robert H. Archer relative to Christian Puff Austria Christian Puff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Christian Puff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert H. Archer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert H. Archer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert H. Archer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert H. Archer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert H. Archer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert H. Archer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert H. Archer. The network helps show where Robert H. Archer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert H. Archer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert H. Archer Line = papers co-authored together Robert H. Archer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200176
2 200171
3 200860
4 201134
5 201530
6 201730
7 201124
8 200620
9 199319
10 199318
11 199215
12 199814
13 20209
14 20148
15 19978
16 20206
17 19876
18
Synopsis of amaryllidaceae from the flora zambesiaca area
20066
19 20035
20 19995

About Robert H. Archer

Robert H. Archer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Forestry and Ecology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (23 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (16 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (10 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (8 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers), Cassava research and cyanide (3 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity (3 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (307 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (107 citations), Forestry (30 citations), Plant Science (182 citations) and Molecular Biology (304 citations). Robert H. Archer has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark P. Simmons, A.E. van Wyk, Vincent Savolainen, Jerrold I. Davis, Andrew Ford, Jennifer J. Cappa, Jeff J. Doyle, Sarah Mathews, Christine D. Bacon and Júlio Antônio Lombardi. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Systematic Botany, IAWA Journal - KU Leuven/IAWA Journal, Taxon and South African Journal of Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact