Robert Guettel
Impact in
- Catalysis top 5%
- Catalysts for Methane Reforming
- Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
- Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
- Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Papers in
-
- Catalysts for Methane Reforming 4
- Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions 1
-
- Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Thomas Turek (5 shared papers)Ulrich Kunz (3 shared papers)Rüdiger Lange (1 shared paper)Shaibal Roy (1 shared paper)Markus Schubert (1 shared paper)Muthanna H. Al‐Dahhan (1 shared paper)Tobias Bauer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Chemical Engineering Science (2 papers)Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (1 paper)Process Safety and Environmental Protection (1 paper)Chemical Engineering & Technology (1 paper)Catalysis Today (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Robert Guettel
6 papers receiving 408 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Catalysis 295
- Biomedical Engineering 262
- Mechanical Engineering 155
- Materials Chemistry 157
- Computational Mechanics 52
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Guettel
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Guettel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Guettel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Guettel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Guettel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Guettel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Guettel. The network helps show where Robert Guettel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Robert Guettel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 148 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 111 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 27 |
About Robert Guettel
Robert Guettel is a scholar working on Catalysis, Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 6 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (5 papers), Catalysts for Methane Reforming (4 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (3 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (2 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (2 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (1 paper) and Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (295 citations), Biomedical Engineering (262 citations), Mechanical Engineering (155 citations), Materials Chemistry (157 citations) and Computational Mechanics (52 citations). Robert Guettel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Turek, Ulrich Kunz, Rüdiger Lange, Shaibal Roy, Markus Schubert, Muthanna H. Al‐Dahhan and Tobias Bauer. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Engineering Science, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Chemical Engineering & Technology and Catalysis Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.