Robert G. Hoeft

2.7k citations
54 papers · 2.1k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Robert G. Hoeft

53 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Robert G. Hoeft
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Soil Science 1.3k
  • Environmental Chemistry 800
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 605
  • Plant Science 928
  • Waste Management and Disposal 170
Replace Keith R. Helyar with:
Keith R. Helyar Australia
Anand Swarup India
Gregory K. Evanylo United States
Finn Pilgaard Vinther Denmark
ICR Holford Australia
R. J. K. Myers Australia
Wilbur W. Frye United States
DP Heenan Australia
Frederick R. Magdoff United States
D. C. Edmeades New Zealand
Robert G. Hoeft relative to Keith R. Helyar Australia Keith R. Helyar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Keith R. Helyar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Hoeft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Hoeft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Hoeft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Hoeft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Hoeft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Hoeft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Hoeft. The network helps show where Robert G. Hoeft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert G. Hoeft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert G. Hoeft Line = papers co-authored together Robert G. Hoeft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001211
2 2001147
3 2005147
4 1988129
5 2006127
6 2007125
7 2003109
8 1973108
9 2004104
10
Modern corn and soybean production
2000103
11 200796
12 200554
13 200545
14 200038
15 200837
16 197237
17 199331
18 199230
19 198829
20 198929

About Robert G. Hoeft

Robert G. Hoeft is a scholar working on Soil Science, Environmental Chemistry, Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science and Geochemistry and Petrology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (23 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (22 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (13 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (8 papers), Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (5 papers), Nitrogen and Sulfur Effects on Brassica (5 papers), Agricultural Science and Fertilization (4 papers) and Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (1.3k citations), Environmental Chemistry (800 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (605 citations), Plant Science (928 citations) and Waste Management and Disposal (170 citations). Robert G. Hoeft has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include R. L. Mulvaney, Emerson D. Nafziger, Shamim Ahmed Kamal Uddin Khan, G. W. Randall, William B. Stevens, Leo M. Walsh, Dennis Raymond Keeney, John E. Sawyer, Eric Adee and Rattan Lal. Their work appears in journals such as Agronomy Journal, Soil Science Society of America Journal, jpa, Journal of Environmental Quality and Soil and Tillage Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact