Robert Freeman Smith

930 citations
53 papers · 244 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Freeman Smith

41 papers receiving 159 citations

Peers

Robert Freeman Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Cultural Studies 45
  • Political Science and International Relations 92
  • Sociology and Political Science 125
  • Development 8
  • History 17
Replace Mark T. Gilderhus with:
Mark T. Gilderhus United States
Lloyd E. Eastman United States
Enrique Krauze
Thomas Schoonover United States
Ian Nish United Kingdom
Marie–Claire Bergère France
Ken Post Netherlands
Dana G. Munro United States
George Schöpflin United Kingdom
Mauricio A. Font United States
Robert Freeman Smith relative to Mark T. Gilderhus United States Mark T. Gilderhus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mark T. Gilderhus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Freeman Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Freeman Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Freeman Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Freeman Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Freeman Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Freeman Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Freeman Smith. The network helps show where Robert Freeman Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Robert Freeman Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Freeman Smith Line = papers co-authored together Robert Freeman Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198376
2 197320
3 196414
4 197313
5 197311
6 19739
7 19899
8 19777
9 19646
10 19996
11 19726
12 19775
13 19895
14 19635
15 20243
16 19723
17 19643
18 19632
19 19632
20 19772

About Robert Freeman Smith

Robert Freeman Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Cultural Studies, History and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 53 papers that have together received 244 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cuban History and Society (21 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (8 papers), Politics and Society in Latin America (5 papers), Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (5 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers) and Asian American and Pacific Histories (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (45 citations), Political Science and International Relations (92 citations), Sociology and Political Science (125 citations), Development (8 citations) and History (17 citations). Robert Freeman Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Richard H. Immerman, Miguel S. Wionczek, Philip S. Foner, Dudley Seers, Linda B. Hall, Ramón Eduardo Ruíz, Kenneth J. Griéb, David Healy, Charles D. Ameringer and Walter V. Scholes. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic American Historical Review, The American Historical Review, Archives and Records, Journal of American History and International Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact