Robert E. Kappler

452 citations
9 papers · 320 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Robert E. Kappler

8 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Robert E. Kappler
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Pharmacology 194
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 93
  • Anatomy 7
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 34
  • Cell Biology 57
Replace John W. Reggars with:
John W. Reggars Australia
Daniel G. Rendeiro United States
Edward F. Owens United States
Meridel I. Gatterman United States
Annemarie de Zoete Netherlands
J. P. Houben Netherlands
Jean-Philippe Paquin Canada
Frank J. Kohlbeck United States
Howard Vernon Canada
Richard Branson United States
Robert E. Kappler relative to John W. Reggars Australia John W. Reggars's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
John W. Reggars · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Kappler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Kappler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Kappler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Kappler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Kappler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Kappler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Kappler. The network helps show where Robert E. Kappler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Kappler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Kappler Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Kappler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1999230
2 199742
3 200020
4
Efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment for low back pain in euhydrated and hypohydrated conditions: a randomized crossover trial.
201210
5 19828
6 19815
7 20144
8 20111
9 20170

About Robert E. Kappler

Robert E. Kappler is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 9 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (1 paper), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (1 paper), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (1 paper), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (1 paper) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (194 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (93 citations), Anatomy (7 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (34 citations) and Cell Biology (57 citations). Robert E. Kappler has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James A. Lipton, Andrew M. Davis, Gunnar Andersson, Sue E. Leurgans, Jeffrey S. Brault, David M. Driscoll, Thomas Glonek, Edgar F. Allin and Kenneth E. Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Spine, New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Osteopathic Medicine and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact