Robert E. Hoskin

649 citations
19 papers · 470 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Robert E. Hoskin

16 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers

Robert E. Hoskin
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • General Decision Sciences 41
  • Accounting 160
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 33
  • Finance 84
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 149
Replace Daniel W. Richards with:
Daniel W. Richards Australia
Tarek Amer United States
Christopher Wong Canada
Élise Payzan-LeNestour Australia
Gianni Brighetti Italy
Jan Seifert Germany
Roeland C. Dietvorst Netherlands
Volker Thoma United Kingdom
Andrej Schoeke United States
Salvador Contreras United States
Robert E. Hoskin relative to Daniel W. Richards Australia Daniel W. Richards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Daniel W. Richards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Hoskin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Hoskin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Hoskin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Hoskin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Hoskin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Hoskin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Hoskin. The network helps show where Robert E. Hoskin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Hoskin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Hoskin Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Hoskin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1986122
2 2012113
3 201858
4 198343
5 201327
6 198226
7 201422
8 201316
9 198110
10 20118
11 20237
12
Opportunity costs and behavior
19815
13 20144
14
Financial Accounting: A User Perspective
19934
15 19892
16 20031
17
Financial Accounting: A Valuation Emphasis
20041
18 19791
19
Financial accounting cases
19880

About Robert E. Hoskin

Robert E. Hoskin is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Strategy and Management, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Accounting and Finance, having authored 19 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (5 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (41 citations), Accounting (160 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (33 citations), Finance (84 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (149 citations). Robert E. Hoskin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include John S. Hughes, William E. Ricks, Liat Levita, Peter Woodruff, Deborah Talmi, Robert J. Swieringa, Hui Guo, Mike D. Hunter, Carlo Berzuini and Thomas R. Dyckman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Accounting Research, Accounting Organizations and Society, British Journal of Psychology, Neuropsychologia and Behavioral Research in Accounting.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact