Robert E. Hoskin

16 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Robert E. Hoskin
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • General Decision Sciences 35
  • Accounting 138
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 32
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 149
  • Finance 71
Replace Daniel W. Richards with:
Daniel W. Richards Canada
Gianni Brighetti Italy
Roeland C. Dietvorst Netherlands
Élise Payzan-LeNestour Australia
Christopher Wong United States
Amos Nadler United States
Andrej Schoeke United States
Salvador Contreras United States
Allan W. Graham United States
Alice J. Lee United States
Robert E. Hoskin relative to Daniel W. Richards Canada Daniel W. Richards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Daniel W. Richards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Hoskin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Hoskin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Hoskin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Hoskin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Hoskin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Hoskin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Hoskin. The network helps show where Robert E. Hoskin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Hoskin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Hoskin Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Hoskin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2012110
2 1986101
3 201859
4 198341
5 201329
6 198227
7 201422
8 201316
9 19818
10 20237
11 20116
12
Financial Accounting: A User Perspective
19935
13
Opportunity costs and behavior
19814
14 20144
15 19892
16 19792
17
Financial Accounting: A Valuation Emphasis
20042
18 20031
19
Financial accounting cases
19880

About Robert E. Hoskin

Robert E. Hoskin is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience, Strategy and Management, Accounting and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (35 citations), Accounting (138 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (32 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (149 citations) and Finance (71 citations). Robert E. Hoskin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Liat Levita, John S. Hughes, William E. Ricks, Peter W R Woodruff, Deborah Talmi, Robert J. Swieringa, Mike D. Hunter, Carlo Berzuini, Hui Yan Guo and Thomas R. Dyckman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Accounting Research, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Accounting Organizations and Society, Cognition and Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact