Robert E. Enck

47 papers receiving 889 citations

Peers

Robert E. Enck
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 66
  • Oncology 163
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 173
  • Cancer Research 75
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 34
Replace Hong Yu with:
Hong Yu China
Charles Weissman Israel
Gauthier Bouche Belgium
Stephen O’Neill United Kingdom
Changchuan Jiang United States
Qin Xu China
Vanessa Rousseau France
Fade Mahmoud United States
Jingqiang Zhu China
Robert E. Enck relative to Hong Yu China Hong Yu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Hong Yu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Enck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Enck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Enck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Enck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Enck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Enck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Enck. The network helps show where Robert E. Enck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Enck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Enck Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Enck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Lung cancer: diagnosis and management.
2007421
2 201674
3 198471
4 199166
5 201342
6 197938
7
An alternative algorithm for dosing transdermal fentanyl for cancer-related pain.
200036
8 201028
9 197926
10 199226
11 198714
12 197612
13 199011
14 200610
15 20128
16 19886
17
Inadvertent chlorambucil overdose in adult.
19776
18 19915
19 20015
20 20135

About Robert E. Enck

Robert E. Enck is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (6 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (4 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (4 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (66 citations), Oncology (163 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (173 citations), Cancer Research (75 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (34 citations). Robert E. Enck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Lauren Collins, C.J. Haines, Robert Perkel, Carlos N. Rios, Robert F. Betts, John B. Bossaer, George Miller, Jeffrey A. Gray, Leslie Citrome and Tai‐Tsang Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, Transfusion, CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians and Academic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact