Robert E. Bannon

701 citations
20 papers · 174 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Robert E. Bannon

14 papers receiving 150 citations

Peers

Robert E. Bannon
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 102
  • Ophthalmology 48
  • Epidemiology 69
  • Computational Mathematics 1
  • Media Technology 10
Replace Paul W. Miles with:
Paul W. Miles Australia
Henry A. Knoll United States
Paul L. Pease United States
Thomas R. Corwin United States
Elmar T. Schmeisser United States
Bernd Lingelbach Germany
Henry W. Hofstetter United States
Michael J. Zigler United States
Editha Ong United States
Frank E. Cheney United States
Robert E. Bannon relative to Paul W. Miles Australia Paul W. Miles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Paul W. Miles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Bannon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Bannon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Bannon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Bannon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Bannon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Bannon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Bannon. The network helps show where Robert E. Bannon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Bannon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Bannon Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Bannon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1951111
2 196514
3 19778
4 19536
5 19526
6 19815
7 19554
8 19534
9 19583
10
Microscopes and eye fatigue.
19723
11 19522
12 19702
13 19521
14 19531
15 19581
16 19551
17 19821
18 19561
19 19540
20 19520

About Robert E. Bannon

Robert E. Bannon is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 174 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color Science and Applications (4 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (3 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper) and Color perception and design (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (102 citations), Ophthalmology (48 citations), Epidemiology (69 citations), Computational Mathematics (1 citation) and Media Technology (10 citations). Robert E. Bannon has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Arthur Linksz, D. I. A. MacLeod, Paul Boeder and Hermann M. Burian. Their work appears in journals such as Optometry and Vision Science, Clinical and Experimental Optometry, International Ophthalmology Clinics and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact