Róbert Chlebo

19 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Róbert Chlebo
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Insect Science 295
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 163
  • Genetics 117
  • Biochemistry 22
  • Food Science 67
Replace Lianfei Cao with:
Lianfei Cao China
Carlos Alfredo Lopes de Carvalho Brazil
Maria Alves Brazil
Alexandros Papachristoforou Greece
Georgios Goras Greece
Wahida Loucif‐Ayad Algeria
Emanuele Carpana Italy
Awraris Getachew Ethiopia
Maria Cristina Affonso Lorenzon Brazil
Marcos da Costa Dórea Brazil
Róbert Chlebo relative to Lianfei Cao China Lianfei Cao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Lianfei Cao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Róbert Chlebo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Róbert Chlebo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Róbert Chlebo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Róbert Chlebo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Róbert Chlebo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Róbert Chlebo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Róbert Chlebo. The network helps show where Róbert Chlebo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Róbert Chlebo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Róbert Chlebo Line = papers co-authored together Róbert Chlebo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201290
2 201376
3 201146
4 200440
5 201224
6 201320
7 201616
8 20244
9
Microflora of the honeybee gastrointestinal tract. Folia Microbiol. 49(2), 169-171
20044
10 20233
11 20163
12 20103
13 20242
14 20242
15 20162
16 20241
17 20241
18 20151
19
Bees and Pesticides
20061
20 20240

About Róbert Chlebo

Róbert Chlebo is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Animal Science and Zoology and Food Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (16 papers), Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (10 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (5 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (2 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (2 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (295 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (163 citations), Genetics (117 citations), Biochemistry (22 citations) and Food Science (67 citations). Róbert Chlebo has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Czechia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Miroslava Kačániová, Katarí­na Rovná, Anna Trakovická, Nenad Vuković, Małgorzata Dżugan, Ivan Špánik, Peter Haščí­k, Simona Kunová, Milan Šimko and Ján Mareček. Their work appears in journals such as Bee World, Journal of Apicultural Research, Animals, Chemistry & Biodiversity and Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact