Robert C. Stabler

443 citations
16 papers · 377 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Robert C. Stabler

13 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

Robert C. Stabler
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 300
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 69
  • Mechanics of Materials 110
  • Radiation 36
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 66
Replace E. A. Yukov with:
E. A. Yukov
Ed R. Smith United States
A. Nordsieck United States
Steven P. Rountree United States
G. K. Oertel United States
G. Nollez France
Steven Alston United States
D K Gibson Australia
F. M. J. Pichanick United States
Haruko Ohmura Japan
Robert C. Stabler relative to E. A. Yukov E. A. Yukov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
E. A. Yukov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Stabler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Stabler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Stabler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Stabler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Stabler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Stabler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Stabler. The network helps show where Robert C. Stabler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Robert C. Stabler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert C. Stabler Line = papers co-authored together Robert C. Stabler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1962157
2 196498
3 196153
4 196326
5 196316
6 19648
7 19655
8 19604
9 19644
10 19623
11 19731
12 19631
13
Energy Loss Mechanisms from Very Dense Stars.
19601
14 19850
15 19730
16 19930

About Robert C. Stabler

Robert C. Stabler is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Radiation, Spectroscopy and Surfaces, Coatings and Films, having authored 16 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (6 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (3 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (3 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (2 papers), Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics (2 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers) and Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (300 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (69 citations), Mechanics of Materials (110 citations), Radiation (36 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (66 citations). Robert C. Stabler has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include S. R. Byron, Hong‐Yee Chiu, E. Gerjuoy, Earle L. Lomon, George H. Vineyard and George L. Trigg. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature, Physics Today, Physics Essays and The Physics of Fluids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact