Robert C. Morehead
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astro and Planetary Science
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Papers in
-
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 3
- Astro and Planetary Science 2
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 2
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 1
-
- Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods 1
- Co-authors
- Eric B. Ford (3 shared papers)Darin Ragozzine (1 shared paper)Barbara Head (1 shared paper)Mark Pfeifer (1 shared paper)Ruth Greenberg (1 shared paper)Monica Shaw (1 shared paper)Paul Robertson (1 shared paper)Joseph D. Twicken (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2 papers)Journal of Palliative Medicine (1 paper)The Astronomical Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert C. Morehead
4 papers receiving 180 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Instrumentation 45
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 143
- Family Practice 2
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 20
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 10
Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Morehead
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Morehead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Morehead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Morehead more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Morehead
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Morehead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Morehead. The network helps show where Robert C. Morehead may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Robert C. Morehead, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 6 |
About Robert C. Morehead
Robert C. Morehead is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistics and Probability, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 4 papers that have together received 186 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (2 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (2 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (1 paper) and Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (45 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (143 citations), Family Practice (2 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (20 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (10 citations). Robert C. Morehead has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eric B. Ford, Darin Ragozzine, Barbara Head, Mark Pfeifer, Ruth Greenberg, Monica Shaw, Paul Robertson, Joseph D. Twicken, Jason F. Rowe and Douglas A. Caldwell. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal of Palliative Medicine and The Astronomical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.