Robert Brooks

5.3k citations
197 papers · 3.4k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Brooks

165 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Robert Brooks
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Finance 1.9k
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 885
  • Economics and Econometrics 2.2k
  • Accounting 715
  • General Energy 44
Replace Lilian Ng with:
Lilian Ng United States
Kees C. G. Koedijk Netherlands
Terence Tai‐Leung Chong Hong Kong
Louis T. W. Cheng Hong Kong
Julio J. Rotemberg United States
Jonathan A. Batten Australia
Elroy Dimson United Kingdom
Michael L. Lemmon United States
Charles Goodhart United Kingdom
Bruno Biais France
Robert Brooks relative to Lilian Ng United States Lilian Ng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Lilian Ng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Brooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Brooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Brooks. The network helps show where Robert Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Brooks Line = papers co-authored together Robert Brooks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 197 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010286
2 2010236
3 2007183
4 1997130
5 2008114
6 1998111
7 200998
8 200993
9 202086
10 201978
11 200067
12 199263
13 200760
14 201054
15 200748
16 201145
17 200738
18 201537
19 200437
20 200136

About Robert Brooks

Robert Brooks is a scholar working on Finance, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and Strategy and Management, having authored 197 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Market Dynamics and Volatility (60 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (59 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (58 papers), Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (45 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (36 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (17 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (17 papers) and Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (1.9k citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (885 citations), Economics and Econometrics (2.2k citations), Accounting (715 citations) and General Energy (44 citations). Robert Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Malaysia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Robert W. Faff, Kian‐Ping Lim, Michael D. McKenzie, Sirimon Treepongkaruna, William Dimovski, Hung Xuan, Jae Hong Kim, Stephen Gray, Kam Fong Chan and Mohan Nandha. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Australian Journal of Management and International Review of Financial Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact