Robert Bonfil
Impact in
- Classics top 10%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Papers in
- Philosophy 13
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 13
- History 10
- Sephardic Jews and Inquisition Studies 9
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 4
- Co-authors
- Roger Chartier (1 shared paper)Guglielmo Cavallο (1 shared paper)Guy G. Stroumsa (3 shared papers)Joseph Shatzmïller (1 shared paper)David S. Katz (1 shared paper)Frank Felsenstein (1 shared paper)David Abulafia (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (2 papers)Shakespeare Quarterly (1 paper)History and Theory (1 paper)Jewish History (4 papers)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited States
In The Last Decade
Robert Bonfil
15 papers receiving 175 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Classics 46
- Religious studies 57
- Philosophy 122
- History 111
- Archeology 74
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Bonfil
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Bonfil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Bonfil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Bonfil more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Bonfil
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Bonfil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Bonfil. The network helps show where Robert Bonfil may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Robert Bonfil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Historia de la lectura en el mundo occidental | 1997 | 127 |
| 2 | 1994 | 63 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 33 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 18 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1980 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 18 | Jews in Byzantium | 2011 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 0 |
About Robert Bonfil
Robert Bonfil is a scholar working on Philosophy, History, Religious studies, Classics and Archeology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval and Classical Philosophy (13 papers), Sephardic Jews and Inquisition Studies (9 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (6 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (3 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (46 citations), Religious studies (57 citations), Philosophy (122 citations), History (111 citations) and Archeology (74 citations). Robert Bonfil has collaborated with scholars based in Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roger Chartier, Guglielmo Cavallο, Guy G. Stroumsa, Joseph Shatzmïller, David S. Katz, Frank Felsenstein and David Abulafia. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Shakespeare Quarterly, History and Theory, Jewish History and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.