Robert Aldrich

1.3k citations
59 papers · 621 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Aldrich

37 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers

Robert Aldrich
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Demography 148
  • Geography, Planning and Development 59
  • Museology 38
  • Anthropology 97
  • Sociology and Political Science 335
Replace Oscar Salemink with:
Oscar Salemink Russia
James Belich New Zealand
Kate Darian‐Smith Australia
Paul Basu United Kingdom
Ann Curthoys Australia
Serge Gruzinski France
Robert E. Bieder United States
Jan Penrose United Kingdom
Debbie Lisle United Kingdom
Russell McGregor Australia
Robert Aldrich relative to Oscar Salemink Russia Oscar Salemink's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Oscar Salemink · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Aldrich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Aldrich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Aldrich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Aldrich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Aldrich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Aldrich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Aldrich. The network helps show where Robert Aldrich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Robert Aldrich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Aldrich Line = papers co-authored together Robert Aldrich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004113
2 199667
3 199864
4 199251
5
The Last Colonies
199847
6 200542
7 200935
8 200835
9
Gay perspectives : essays in Australian gay culture
199222
10 199021
11 199315
12 202014
13 200214
14 200611
15 20208
16 20098
17 20126
18
The Ends of Empire : The Last Colonies Revisited
20205
19 19875
20 20184

About Robert Aldrich

Robert Aldrich is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology, Demography, History and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 59 papers that have together received 621 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (12 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (10 papers), African history and culture studies (8 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (5 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Australian History and Society (4 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (4 papers) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (148 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (59 citations), Museology (38 citations), Anthropology (97 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (335 citations). Robert Aldrich has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include John M. Connell, John P. Connell, John Connell, Frank Ben Tipton and Raymond F. Betts. Their work appears in journals such as History Australia, Australian Journal of Politics & History, Journal de la Société des océanistes, The American Historical Review and Urban Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact