Robert A. Hearn

787 citations
18 papers · 267 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Robert A. Hearn

17 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers

Robert A. Hearn
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 27
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 101
  • Radiation 51
  • Computer Networks and Communications 73
  • Artificial Intelligence 86
Replace Paul Liu with:
Paul Liu United States
Serge Miguet France
Yu-Tai Ching Taiwan
Mark Christiaens Belgium
Ken Martin United States
S. Weitzel United States
Guangyuan Li China
Petter Strandmark Sweden
Mingyan Jiang China
Michael Quinlan United States
Robert A. Hearn relative to Paul Liu United States Paul Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Paul Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert A. Hearn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert A. Hearn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert A. Hearn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert A. Hearn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert A. Hearn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert A. Hearn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert A. Hearn. The network helps show where Robert A. Hearn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert A. Hearn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert A. Hearn Line = papers co-authored together Robert A. Hearn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2005103
2 200745
3 200943
4 200120
5
Push-2-f is pspace-complete.
200210
6 200810
7 201010
8 20077
9
Hinged Dissection of Polygons is Hard
20034
10 20193
11
Learning Hierarchical Representations and Behaviors.
20083
12 19763
13 20062
14 20091
15 20211
16 20091
17 20211
18 19740

About Robert A. Hearn

Robert A. Hearn is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 18 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artificial Intelligence in Games (6 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (5 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (4 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers), Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (2 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (2 papers) and Formal Methods in Verification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (27 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (101 citations), Radiation (51 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (73 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (86 citations). Robert A. Hearn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Erik D. Demaine, Wayne M. Butler, Richard Granger, Mark J. Rivard, Jeffrey F. Williamson, John K. Hayes, Phillip M. Devlin, Eugene P. Lief, Ali S. Meigooni and Gregory S. Merrick. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Physics, Theoretical Computer Science, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Radiation Measurements and Brachytherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact