Rob Fraser

1.5k citations
85 papers · 1.0k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Rob Fraser

75 papers receiving 926 citations

Peers

Rob Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 186
  • Economics and Econometrics 305
  • Soil Science 99
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 211
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 61
Replace Alison Burrell with:
Alison Burrell United Kingdom
Dustin L. Pendell United States
Lovell S. Jarvis United States
John G. Lee United States
Lili Guo China
Alex E Winter-Nelson United States
Jimin Wang China
Li Fang China
James Kliebenstein United States
Richard Tranter United Kingdom
Rob Fraser relative to Alison Burrell United Kingdom Alison Burrell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.8×
Alison Burrell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rob Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Fraser. The network helps show where Rob Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rob Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rob Fraser Line = papers co-authored together Rob Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200980
2 201857
3 201149
4 200245
5 201444
6 201941
7 202034
8 200633
9 200833
10 201031
11 200430
12 199828
13 202126
14 199225
15 201125
16 201924
17 201922
18 200721
19 199621
20 198820

About Rob Fraser

Rob Fraser is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, Soil Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Economics and Policy (20 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (14 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (14 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (9 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (8 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (5 papers) and Economic theories and models (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (186 citations), Economics and Econometrics (305 citations), Soil Science (99 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (211 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (61 citations). Rob Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David C Cook, Iain Fraser, Emmanuelle Quillérou, Alasdair J. C. Cook, Dean Ronald Paini, David Alexander Wood, Janarthanan Sathananthan, John G. Webb, Ross Kingwell and Philippe Pîbarot. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, EuroIntervention, Resources Policy and Food Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact