R.J. Pieper

467 citations
59 papers · 344 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

R.J. Pieper

47 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

R.J. Pieper
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Media Technology 72
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 116
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 191
  • Biophysics 18
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 46
Replace Michael W. Haney with:
Michael W. Haney United States
E.S. Schlig United States
W. A. Ramadan Egypt
Jacques E. Ludman United States
Lin Gan China
Hongxin Huang Japan
Rick L. Morrison United States
Dong Zhu China
Yuanlong Deng China
R.J. Pieper relative to Michael W. Haney United States Michael W. Haney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael W. Haney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.J. Pieper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.J. Pieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.J. Pieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.J. Pieper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.J. Pieper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.J. Pieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.J. Pieper. The network helps show where R.J. Pieper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside R.J. Pieper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.J. Pieper Line = papers co-authored together R.J. Pieper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198387
2 201657
3 200933
4 201113
5 199311
6 20109
7 19859
8 19989
9 19869
10 19918
11 20057
12 19837
13
A Robust Algorithm for Predicting Freezeout and Exhaustion Under Equilibrium Conditions
19996
14 19906
15 20026
16 19966
17 20055
18 20085
19 19904
20 19874

About R.J. Pieper

R.J. Pieper is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 59 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (11 papers), Optical and Acousto-Optic Technologies (7 papers), Induction Heating and Inverter Technology (6 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (6 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (5 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (5 papers), Heat Transfer and Optimization (5 papers) and Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (72 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (116 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (191 citations), Biophysics (18 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (46 citations). R.J. Pieper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include A. Korpel, H. Stiegler, Manuel Quevedo-López, Bruce E. Gnade, I. Mejía, A. Korpel, A. D. Kraus, Ting‐Chung Poon, Bradley D. Duncan and Willy Hereman. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Education, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Thin Solid Films, Journal of Computational Electronics and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact