Rita Copeland
Impact in
Papers in
- Classics 9
- Medieval Literature and History 9
- Byzantine Studies and History 1
-
- Translation Studies and Practices 3
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning 1
- Co-authors
- Stephen Melville (2 shared papers)Norman Vance (1 shared paper)Jennifer Wallace (1 shared paper)Kenneth Haynes (1 shared paper)David Hopkins (1 shared paper)Philip Hardie (1 shared paper)Charles Martindale (1 shared paper)Patrick Cheney (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Speculum (3 papers)Exemplaria (2 papers)The Journal of English and Germanic Philology (1 paper)New Literary History (1 paper)Studies in the age of Chaucer (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Rita Copeland
16 papers receiving 201 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Classics 218
- History 125
- Language and Linguistics 92
- Literature and Literary Theory 74
- Anthropology 41
Countries citing papers authored by Rita Copeland
This map shows the geographic impact of Rita Copeland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita Copeland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita Copeland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rita Copeland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita Copeland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita Copeland. The network helps show where Rita Copeland may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Rita Copeland, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 156 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 100 | |
| 3 | Criticism and dissent in the Middle Ages | 1996 | 36 |
| 4 | 1992 | 12 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 8 | The Oxford history of classical reception in English literature | 2012 | 6 |
| 9 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 0 |
About Rita Copeland
Rita Copeland is a scholar working on Classics, Language and Linguistics, History, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 22 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (9 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (1 paper), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (218 citations), History (125 citations), Language and Linguistics (92 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (74 citations) and Anthropology (41 citations). Rita Copeland has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Melville, Norman Vance, Jennifer Wallace, Kenneth Haynes, David Hopkins, Philip Hardie, Charles Martindale, Patrick Cheney and Frances Ferguson. Their work appears in journals such as Speculum, Exemplaria, The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, New Literary History and Studies in the age of Chaucer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.