Rita Campi

1.2k citations
47 papers · 786 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Rita Campi

42 papers receiving 770 citations

Peers

Rita Campi
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 236
  • Clinical Psychology 231
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 17
  • General Health Professions 91
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 24
Replace Jennifer Steffes with:
Jennifer Steffes United States
Yui Yamaoka Japan
Amy Young Australia
Seyed Abbas Mousavi Iran
Christof Meigen Germany
Mariana Cremonte Argentina
Isabel María Fernández‐Medina Spain
Maya Lerman Israel
Alessandro Ferruzzi Italy
Mark E. Barrett United States
Rita Campi relative to Jennifer Steffes United States Jennifer Steffes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jennifer Steffes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rita Campi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rita Campi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita Campi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita Campi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rita Campi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita Campi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita Campi. The network helps show where Rita Campi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rita Campi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rita Campi Line = papers co-authored together Rita Campi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202182
2 202267
3 200267
4 200764
5 202163
6 202160
7 200256
8 200145
9 202244
10 202141
11 200525
12 200521
13 202017
14 200813
15 200912
16 201210
17 201610
18 201210
19 20049
20 20037

About Rita Campi

Rita Campi is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 47 papers that have together received 786 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical studies and practices (8 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (5 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Regional Development and Policy (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (236 citations), Clinical Psychology (231 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (17 citations), General Health Professions (91 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (24 citations). Rita Campi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Maurizio Bonati, Giulia Segre, Antonio Clavenna, Michele Zanetti, Chiara Pandolfini, Francesca Scarpellini, Massimo Cartabia, Francesca Rocchi, P. Impicciatore and Davide Provasi. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Paediatrica, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, BMC Pediatrics, BMC Psychiatry and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact