Richard Simper

40 papers receiving 969 citations

Peers

Richard Simper
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Management Science and Operations Research 658
  • Finance 494
  • Accounting 351
  • Economics and Econometrics 517
  • Strategy and Management 137
Replace J. Colin Glass with:
J. Colin Glass United Kingdom
Rachita Gulati India
Eilev S. Jansen Norway
Maximilian J.B. Hall United Kingdom
Luca Papi Italy
Удо Бролл Germany
Hongmin Zi United States
Emmanuel Mamatzakis United Kingdom
Christos Staikouras Greece
Richard Simper relative to J. Colin Glass United Kingdom J. Colin Glass's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
J. Colin Glass · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Simper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Simper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Simper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Simper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Simper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Simper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Simper. The network helps show where Richard Simper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Richard Simper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Simper Line = papers co-authored together Richard Simper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005285
2 200797
3 200386
4 201052
5 200046
6 200245
7 201533
8 200133
9 200831
10 200530
11 200528
12 201223
13 201123
14 200422
15 201522
16 200321
17 200920
18 199819
19 201919
20 201014

About Richard Simper

Richard Simper is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Finance, Accounting and Strategy and Management, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (28 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (19 papers), Housing Market and Economics (14 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (12 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (11 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (3 papers) and Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (658 citations), Finance (494 citations), Accounting (351 citations), Economics and Econometrics (517 citations) and Strategy and Management (137 citations). Richard Simper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Indonesia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Leigh Drake, Maximilian J.B. Hall, Karligash Kenjegalieva, Wimboh Santoso, Valentin Zelenyuk, Thomas Weyman–Jones, Tom Weyman-Jones, Wenbin Liu, Zhongbao Zhou and Raman Bedi. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Journal of Banking & Finance, International Review of Law and Economics, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences and Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact