Richard Lim

822 citations
43 papers · 661 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Lim

40 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers

Richard Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 300
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 82
  • Physiology 164
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 70
  • Internal Medicine 11
Replace Maria Estefânia Bosco Otto with:
Maria Estefânia Bosco Otto Brazil
Ondřej Ludka Czechia
Judith H. Murphy United States
Lars Mogensen Sweden
Marcus J. Mianulli United States
Fleur Poelkens Netherlands
Jane Sparrow United Kingdom
J Pidgeon United Kingdom
Sérgio Matoso Laranjo Portugal
Nancy B. Greilich United States
Richard Lim relative to Maria Estefânia Bosco Otto Brazil Maria Estefânia Bosco Otto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Maria Estefânia Bosco Otto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Lim. The network helps show where Richard Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Lim Line = papers co-authored together Richard Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006259
2 202159
3 202056
4 202136
5 201826
6 199725
7 199222
8 200721
9 199219
10 199719
11 201717
12 199212
13 200410
14 199010
15 19977
16 19936
17 19915
18 19975
19 20084
20 19914

About Richard Lim

Richard Lim is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Physiology and Internal Medicine, having authored 43 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (14 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (10 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (4 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (4 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (3 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (300 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (82 citations), Physiology (164 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (70 citations) and Internal Medicine (11 citations). Richard Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. Garrahy, Thomas Hugh Marwick, James E. Sharman, Jayne C. Carberry, Danny Joel Eckert, Jeff Scott Coombes, Ian B. Wilkinson, Malcolm I. Burgess, Ludovico Messineo and Warren K. Laskey. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, Heart, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, The Lancet and The Journal of Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact