Richard Eves

46 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Richard Eves
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Anthropology 262
  • Geography, Planning and Development 100
  • Demography 142
  • Health 72
  • Sociology and Political Science 343
Replace Fenella Cannell with:
Fenella Cannell United Kingdom
Isak Niehaus United Kingdom
Susan Snow Wadley United States
Jessaca B. Leinaweaver United States
Joanne Barker United States
Maria G. Cattell United States
Nancy Rose Hunt United States
Paula Brown Glick United States
Richard Burghart United Kingdom
Mariane C. Ferme United States
Richard Eves relative to Fenella Cannell United Kingdom Fenella Cannell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Fenella Cannell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Eves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Eves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Eves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Eves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Eves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Eves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Eves. The network helps show where Richard Eves may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Richard Eves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Eves Line = papers co-authored together Richard Eves links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199654
2 200053
3
The Magical Body: Power, Fame and Meaning in a Melanesian Society
199849
4 200347
5 201534
6 201028
7 199628
8 201226
9 201021
10 201620
11 201920
12 201519
13 200016
14 201116
15 200315
16 202015
17 200813
18 199513
19 200712
20 200511

About Richard Eves

Richard Eves is a scholar working on Anthropology, Geography, Planning and Development, Demography, Sociology and Political Science and Health, having authored 50 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anthropological Studies and Insights (20 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (14 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (9 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (9 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (4 papers), Sex work and related issues (4 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (262 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (100 citations), Demography (142 citations), Health (72 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (343 citations). Richard Eves has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Papua New Guinea and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Miranda Forsyth, Angela Kelly‐Hanku, Leslie Butt, J Kaldor, Maxine Anne Whittaker, Lisa Fitzgerald, Andrew John Vallely and Rose Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Oceania, Culture Health & Sexuality, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, The Australian Journal of Anthropology and The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact