Richard E. Vatz
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies
-
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Narrative Theory and Analysis
Papers in
- Philosophy 10
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 6
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies 4
-
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 2
- Gambling Behavior and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Thomas Szasz (1 shared paper)Robert L. Ivie (1 shared paper)John Fiske (1 shared paper)Linda K. Fuller (1 shared paper)Martin J. Medhurst (1 shared paper)Carl Plantinga (1 shared paper)John H. Patton (1 shared paper)Joseph J. Pilotta (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Quarterly Journal of Speech (3 papers)The Journal of Psychiatry & Law (2 papers)Journal of Communication (1 paper)JAMA (1 paper)Metamedicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Richard E. Vatz
17 papers receiving 219 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Philosophy 153
- Literature and Literary Theory 111
- Communication 64
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 51
- General Psychology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Vatz
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Vatz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Vatz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Vatz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Vatz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Vatz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Vatz. The network helps show where Richard E. Vatz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Richard E. Vatz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation | 1973 | 236 |
| 2 | Thomas Szasz: Primary Values and Major Contentions | 1982 | 12 |
| 3 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 4 | The conceptual bind in defining the volitional component of alcoholism: consequences for public policy and scientific research | 1990 | 8 |
| 5 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1974 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1981 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1976 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1981 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 1 |
About Richard E. Vatz
Richard E. Vatz is a scholar working on Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Communication, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (4 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (2 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (153 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (111 citations), Communication (64 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (51 citations) and General Psychology (3 citations). Richard E. Vatz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Szasz, Robert L. Ivie, John Fiske, Linda K. Fuller, Martin J. Medhurst, Carl Plantinga, John H. Patton, Joseph J. Pilotta, Phillip K. Tompkins and Thomas A. Hollihan. Their work appears in journals such as Quarterly Journal of Speech, The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, Journal of Communication, JAMA and Metamedicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.