Richard E. Kaufman
Impact in
- Microbiology top 2%
- Reproductive tract infections research
- Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
-
- Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment 5
-
- Reproductive tract infections research 4
- Co-authors
- Paul J. Wiesner (6 shared papers)Clyde Thornsberry (2 shared papers)Gladys H. Reynolds (2 shared papers)Robert E. Johnson (2 shared papers)Harold W. Jaffe (2 shared papers)James W. Biddle (1 shared paper)JOSEPH H. BLOUNT (2 shared papers)Oscar G. Jones (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of Medicine (3 papers)Public health reviews (1 paper)JAMA (1 paper)Sexually Transmitted Diseases (1 paper)Sexually Transmitted Infections (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Richard E. Kaufman
8 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Microbiology 202
- Physiology 137
- Epidemiology 94
- Urology 11
- Infectious Diseases 33
Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Kaufman
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Kaufman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Kaufman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Kaufman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Kaufman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Kaufman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Kaufman. The network helps show where Richard E. Kaufman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Richard E. Kaufman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1976 | 142 | |
| 2 | 1976 | 52 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 51 | |
| 4 | The FTA-ABS (IgM) test for neonatal congenital syphilis: A critical review. | 1974 | 42 |
| 5 | 1974 | 23 | |
| 6 | 1974 | 21 | |
| 7 | Current trends in syphilis. | 1974 | 5 |
| 8 | 1974 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1974 | 1 |
About Richard E. Kaufman
Richard E. Kaufman is a scholar working on Physiology, Microbiology, Epidemiology, Pharmacology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper), Virology and Viral Diseases (1 paper), Urological Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Plant and fungal interactions (1 paper), Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (1 paper) and Poisoning and overdose treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (202 citations), Physiology (137 citations), Epidemiology (94 citations), Urology (11 citations) and Infectious Diseases (33 citations). Richard E. Kaufman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul J. Wiesner, Clyde Thornsberry, Gladys H. Reynolds, Robert E. Johnson, Harold W. Jaffe, James W. Biddle, JOSEPH H. BLOUNT, Oscar G. Jones and James D. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Public health reviews, JAMA, Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Sexually Transmitted Infections.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.