Richard E. Greenleaf

44 papers receiving 238 citations

Peers

Richard E. Greenleaf
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 148
  • Religious studies 69
  • Anthropology 109
  • Demography 106
  • Cultural Studies 50
Replace David Cahill with:
David Cahill Australia
Stafford Poole United States
Camilla Townsend United States
Kevin Gosner United States
Susan Deans‐Smith United States
Paul J. Hauben United States
Christon I. Archer Canada
Christine Hünefeldt United States
Mario Rodríguez United States
Joanne Punzo Waghorne United States
Richard E. Greenleaf relative to David Cahill Australia David Cahill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
David Cahill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Greenleaf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Greenleaf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Greenleaf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Greenleaf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Greenleaf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Greenleaf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Greenleaf. The network helps show where Richard E. Greenleaf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Richard E. Greenleaf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard E. Greenleaf Line = papers co-authored together Richard E. Greenleaf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199457
2 196547
3 197824
4 196423
5 197021
6 198016
7 197114
8 198113
9 199411
10 198510
11
Inquisición y sociedad en el México Colonial
19859
12 19808
13 19887
14 19677
15 19717
16 19757
17 19746
18 19956
19 19696
20 19805

About Richard E. Greenleaf

Richard E. Greenleaf is a scholar working on Demography, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History, Sociology and Political Science and Anthropology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies in Latin America (36 papers), Latin American history and culture (30 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), History and Politics in Latin America (5 papers), Historical Studies on Spain (5 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (5 papers) and Religious and Theological Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (148 citations), Religious studies (69 citations), Anthropology (109 citations), Demography (106 citations) and Cultural Studies (50 citations). Richard E. Greenleaf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Robert S. Chamberlain, C. Michael Gibson, William L. Sherman, Ward Barrett, Michael C. Meyer, Enrique Dussel, Royden Harrison, Woodrow Borah and John W. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic American Historical Review, The American Historical Review, The Americas A Quarterly Review of Latin American History, Journal of Church and State and Western Historical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact