Richard E. Greenleaf

42 papers receiving 189 citations

Peers

Richard E. Greenleaf
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 143
  • Religious studies 63
  • Anthropology 79
  • Demography 97
  • Cultural Studies 37
Replace Susan Deans‐Smith with:
Susan Deans‐Smith United States
Louise M. Burkhart United States
Stafford Poole United States
Paul J. Hauben United States
Mary Elizabeth Perry United States
Christon I. Archer Canada
Thomas A. Abercrombie United States
Roy Arthur Glasgow Canada
Donald Weinstein United States
Michael Mullin United States
Richard E. Greenleaf relative to Susan Deans‐Smith United States Susan Deans‐Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Susan Deans‐Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Greenleaf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Greenleaf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Greenleaf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Greenleaf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Greenleaf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Greenleaf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Greenleaf. The network helps show where Richard E. Greenleaf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Richard E. Greenleaf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard E. Greenleaf Line = papers co-authored together Richard E. Greenleaf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196529
2 196423
3 199422
4 197015
5 197815
6 197111
7 198011
8 19949
9 19859
10
Inquisición y sociedad en el México Colonial
19858
11 19808
12 19717
13 19817
14 19757
15 19746
16 19886
17 19695
18 19675
19 19805
20 19925

About Richard E. Greenleaf

Richard E. Greenleaf is a scholar working on Demography, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History, Sociology and Political Science and Anthropology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies in Latin America (32 papers), Latin American history and culture (28 papers), Historical Studies on Spain (5 papers), Religious and Theological Studies (5 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), History and Politics in Latin America (4 papers) and Latin American and Latino Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (143 citations), Religious studies (63 citations), Anthropology (79 citations), Demography (97 citations) and Cultural Studies (37 citations). Richard E. Greenleaf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Robert S. Chamberlain, C. Michael Gibson, William L. Sherman, Ward Barrett, Michael C. Meyer, Woodrow Borah, Enrique Dussel, Royden Harrison and John W. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic American Historical Review, The American Historical Review, The Americas A Quarterly Review of Latin American History, Western Historical Quarterly and Journal of Church and State.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact