Richard E. Faust

17 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

Richard E. Faust
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • Epidemiology 153
  • Clinical Psychology 73
  • General Health Professions 84
  • Pharmacology 45
Replace William J. Bukoski with:
William J. Bukoski United States
Michael Klitzner United States
Mark Hochhauser United States
Michael Coe United States
Vincent J. Nerviano United States
Iva Pejnović Franelić Croatia
Debby Allen United Kingdom
Aashir Nasim United States
Amber M. Henslee United States
Ryan O'Mara United States
Richard E. Faust relative to William J. Bukoski United States William J. Bukoski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
William J. Bukoski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard E. Faust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard E. Faust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard E. Faust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard E. Faust more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard E. Faust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard E. Faust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard E. Faust. The network helps show where Richard E. Faust may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Richard E. Faust, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard E. Faust Line = papers co-authored together Richard E. Faust links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974145
2 1976115
3 197626
4 196721
5 195814
6 19745
7 19715
8 19975
9 19854
10 19843
11 19783
12 19782
13 19842
14 19651
15 19761
16 19551
17 19801
18 19741
19 20120
20 19860

About Richard E. Faust

Richard E. Faust is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (2 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (30 citations), Epidemiology (153 citations), Clinical Psychology (73 citations), General Health Professions (84 citations) and Pharmacology (45 citations). Richard E. Faust has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Denise B. Kandel, Eric Single, David M. Treiman, Richard C. Anderson, Donald J. Treiman, Egil Ramstad, George L. Ackerman, Marcelo Soares Pimenta, John L. Colaizzi and Joseph A. Barone. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Drug Information Journal, Journal of Educational Psychology and Journal of Health and Social Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact