Richard Bavier

16 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Richard Bavier
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Ophthalmology 147
  • Gender Studies 39
  • Otorhinolaryngology 14
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 58
  • General Health Professions 42
Replace Omofolasade Kosoko‐Lasaki with:
Omofolasade Kosoko‐Lasaki United States
Leonardo Fabio Morales Spain
Devan Pillay South Africa
Francesca Magli Italy
Rob Jones United Kingdom
Daniel J. Friend United States
Robert E. Weir United States
Catherine Maclean United Kingdom
Andrea Lynch United Kingdom
Claire Cochrane United Kingdom
Richard Bavier relative to Omofolasade Kosoko‐Lasaki United States Omofolasade Kosoko‐Lasaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Omofolasade Kosoko‐Lasaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Bavier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Bavier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Bavier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Bavier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Bavier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Bavier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Bavier. The network helps show where Richard Bavier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Bavier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Bavier Line = papers co-authored together Richard Bavier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2016128
2 201854
3
Welfare Reform Data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation
200123
4 200722
5 201921
6 202015
7
Welfare Reform Impacts in the SIPP.
200214
8 201914
9 201412
10 20119
11 20197
12 20194
13
Anatomical Location-Specific Normative Quantification of Macular Nonperfusion in Diabetic Retinopathy using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA)
20172
14 20092
15 19982
16
A legislatively-based poverty threshold
20091
17 19771
18 20250

About Richard Bavier

Richard Bavier is a scholar working on Surgery, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Ophthalmology and Gender Studies, having authored 18 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (3 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (2 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (147 citations), Gender Studies (39 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (14 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (58 citations) and General Health Professions (42 citations). Richard Bavier has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard B. Rosen, Brian Krawitz, Shelley Mo, Toco Yuen Ping Chui, Luna Xu, Yijie Lin, Paul A. Sidoti, James C. Tsai, Nicole Scripsema and Steven Agemy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Monthly labor review, International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, The Laryngoscope and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact