Richard Adderley

438 citations
25 papers · 293 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Adderley

24 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers

Richard Adderley
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Information Systems 86
  • Sociology and Political Science 128
  • General Health Professions 47
  • Artificial Intelligence 70
  • Signal Processing 22
Replace Clare Hooper with:
Clare Hooper United Kingdom
Todd Bodnar United States
Stephen L. Roberts United Kingdom
Luk Arbuckle Canada
Tatiana Barcelos Pontes Brazil
Muhammad “Tuan” Amith United States
Laura Lynch United States
Carlos Henrique de Oliveira Brazil
Larissa Deadame de Figueiredo Nicolete Brazil
Richard Adderley relative to Clare Hooper United Kingdom Clare Hooper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Clare Hooper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Adderley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Adderley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Adderley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Adderley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Adderley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Adderley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Adderley. The network helps show where Richard Adderley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Adderley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Adderley Line = papers co-authored together Richard Adderley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200635
2 201534
3 200133
4 200127
5 200725
6 200325
7 201718
8 200416
9 200815
10 20089
11 20218
12 20167
13 20227
14 20007
15 20157
16 20086
17 20133
18 20223
19 20142
20 20082

About Richard Adderley

Richard Adderley is a scholar working on Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Genetics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers), Digital and Cyber Forensics (5 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (5 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (4 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (3 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems (86 citations), Sociology and Political Science (128 citations), General Health Professions (47 citations), Artificial Intelligence (70 citations) and Signal Processing (22 citations). Richard Adderley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Bahamas. Frequent co-authors include John W. Bond, Michael Townsley, Lynette Deveaux, Max Bramer, BONITA F. STANTON, Sharon P. Marshall, Sonja Lunn, Xiaoming Li, Atta Badii and Bo Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Implementation Science, Prevention Science, International Journal of Police Science & Management, Policing An International Journal and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact