R.I. Van Hook

1.1k citations
29 papers · 771 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

R.I. Van Hook

29 papers receiving 597 citations

Peers

R.I. Van Hook
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 170
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 189
  • Global and Planetary Change 189
  • Pollution 97
  • Insect Science 103
Replace L. W. Parker with:
L. W. Parker United States
K. Garbutt United States
Franz Rebele Germany
Jennifer M. Shay Canada
J. B. Waide United States
Peter L. Weaver Puerto Rico
Sten Struwe Denmark
D. M. Lehmkuhl Canada
Michael Treshow United States
S. Mark Nelson United States
R.I. Van Hook relative to L. W. Parker United States L. W. Parker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
L. W. Parker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.I. Van Hook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.I. Van Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.I. Van Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.I. Van Hook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.I. Van Hook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.I. Van Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.I. Van Hook. The network helps show where R.I. Van Hook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside R.I. Van Hook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.I. Van Hook Line = papers co-authored together R.I. Van Hook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971172
2 1989156
3 197393
4 197461
5 197940
6 197735
7 197529
8 198025
9 198225
10 198424
11 196914
12
Short-Rotation Woody-Crops Program
198313
13 197411
14 19799
15
Radionuclide dynamics in insect food chains
19709
16 19787
17 19737
18 20187
19 19706
20 19766

About R.I. Van Hook

R.I. Van Hook is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Pollution, having authored 29 papers that have together received 771 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Utilization and Effects (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (3 papers), Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology (3 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (3 papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (170 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (189 citations), Global and Planetary Change (189 citations), Pollution (97 citations) and Insect Science (103 citations). R.I. Van Hook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovakia and Kazakhstan. Frequent co-authors include Dale W. Johnson, David E. Reichle, Robert A. Goldstein, D. A. Crossley, Herman H. Shugart, Mogens Gissel Nielsen, Annetta P. Watson, D.C. West, L.K. Mann and R. V. O’Neill. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Health Perspectives, Ecology, Health Physics, Ecological Monographs and Journal of Insect Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact