R.G. Elmore

78 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

R.G. Elmore
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 961
  • Equine 99
  • Small Animals 221
  • Reproductive Medicine 205
  • Animal Science and Zoology 228
Replace L. Zarco with:
L. Zarco Mexico
Maike Heppelmann Germany
J.E. Bruemmer United States
Jeremy R. Miles United States
Mark A. Mirando United States
Caroline Walker New Zealand
Masaharu MORIYOSHI Japan
Francesco Camillo Italy
Duccio Panzani Italy
G.C. van der Weijden Netherlands
R.G. Elmore relative to L. Zarco Mexico L. Zarco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
L. Zarco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.G. Elmore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.G. Elmore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.G. Elmore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.G. Elmore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.G. Elmore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.G. Elmore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.G. Elmore. The network helps show where R.G. Elmore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R.G. Elmore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.G. Elmore Line = papers co-authored together R.G. Elmore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977118
2 200870
3 198058
4 197955
5 197952
6 200946
7 197844
8 197841
9 199039
10 197639
11 198238
12 198037
13 198136
14 198136
15 200335
16 197632
17 198532
18 198030
19 197830
20 200527

About R.G. Elmore

R.G. Elmore is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Reproductive Medicine, Small Animals and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (44 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (9 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (8 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (7 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (7 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (7 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (961 citations), Equine (99 citations), Small Animals (221 citations), Reproductive Medicine (205 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (228 citations). R.G. Elmore has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include H.A. Garverick, R.S. Youngquist, C.J. Bierschwal, D.J. Kesler, Andrew J. Li, Beth Y. Karlan, Esther M. Brown, Alexander Sharp, T.L. Blanchard and J. N. Berg. Their work appears in journals such as Theriogenology, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, American Journal of Veterinary Research and Journal of Animal Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact