Reto Stocker

6.3k citations
111 papers · 4.1k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Reto Stocker

106 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Reto Stocker
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 631
  • Emergency Medicine 456
  • Neurology 651
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 274
  • Epidemiology 875
Replace François Feihl with:
François Feihl Switzerland
Philippe Gajdos France
Eike Martin Germany
Sven‐Erik Ricksten Sweden
Thomas Scheeren Netherlands
Luciana Mascia Italy
Mark A. Helfaer United States
Ronnie Guillet United States
M. Mathru United States
Robert W. Hickey United States
Reto Stocker relative to François Feihl Switzerland François Feihl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
François Feihl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Reto Stocker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Reto Stocker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reto Stocker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reto Stocker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Reto Stocker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reto Stocker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reto Stocker. The network helps show where Reto Stocker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Reto Stocker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Reto Stocker Line = papers co-authored together Reto Stocker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007273
2 2009255
3 1995229
4 2000220
5 1997219
6 2000205
7 1997132
8 2005129
9 2009127
10 2003115
11 2004110
12 2010105
13 201590
14 200986
15 199784
16 200982
17 200378
18 200977
19 201070
20 199669

About Reto Stocker

Reto Stocker is a scholar working on Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 111 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (24 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (12 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (8 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (7 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (6 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (5 papers) and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (631 citations), Emergency Medicine (456 citations), Neurology (651 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (274 citations) and Epidemiology (875 citations). Reto Stocker has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include O. Trentz, Marius Keel, Claudio L. Bassetti, Christian R. Baumann, Wolfgang Ertel, Thomas A. Neff, Thomas Kossmann, Otmar Trentz, Maria Cristina Morganti-Kossmann and C. Haberthür. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care, Critical Care Medicine, Der Unfallchirurg, Acta Neurochirurgica and Swiss Medical Weekly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact