Renyi Wu

3.4k citations
65 papers · 2.0k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Renyi Wu

64 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Renyi Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Ophthalmology 1.2k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.0k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 265
  • Epidemiology 448
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 189
Replace Danielle L. Chandler with:
Danielle L. Chandler United States
Andrew Hendrick United States
E. Eugenie Hartmann United States
Xiayin Zhang China
Carla Lança Portugal
Carolina P. B. Gracitelli Brazil
Shaban Demirel United States
Maija Mäntyjärvi Finland
Joost Felius United States
Ramanjit Sihota India
Renyi Wu relative to Danielle L. Chandler United States Danielle L. Chandler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Danielle L. Chandler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Renyi Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Renyi Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renyi Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renyi Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Renyi Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renyi Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renyi Wu. The network helps show where Renyi Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Renyi Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Renyi Wu Line = papers co-authored together Renyi Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998345
2 2012126
3 2010112
4 2011106
5 201598
6 201193
7 201182
8 201171
9 201170
10 201066
11 201262
12 201160
13 201356
14 201549
15 201249
16 201236
17 201434
18 201531
19 201730
20
A nonsense mutation in CRYGC associated with autosomal dominant congenital nuclear cataract in a Chinese family.
200827

About Renyi Wu

Renyi Wu is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Genetics, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (26 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (16 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (12 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (9 papers), Connexins and lens biology (7 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (6 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (5 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.2k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.0k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (265 citations), Epidemiology (448 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (189 citations). Renyi Wu has collaborated with scholars based in China, Singapore and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tien Yin Wong, Tin Aung, Seang‐Mei Saw, Yingfeng Zheng, Raghavan Lavanya, Daniel S. Weiss, Kevin Delucchi, Thomas J. Metzler, Douglas Zatzick and Frank B. Schoenfeld. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology, JAMA Ophthalmology and Materials & Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact