R.E. Slaughter
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer survivorship and care
Papers in
-
- Knowledge Management and Sharing 1
- Oncology 1
- Cancer survivorship and care 1
- Co-authors
- William L. Holzemer (3 shared papers)Carmen J. Portillo (2 shared papers)Dean Wantland (1 shared paper)Eva McGhee (1 shared paper)Barbara F. Piper (1 shared paper)M. Dodd (1 shared paper)Marisa C. Weiss (1 shared paper)Steven M. Paul (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)Nursing Research (1 paper)Journal of Cancer Education (1 paper)Journal of Pediatric Health Care (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
R.E. Slaughter
5 papers receiving 1.5k citations
R.E. Slaughter's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Applied Psychology 183
- Oncology 362
- General Health Professions 312
- Psychiatry and Mental health 140
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 138
Countries citing papers authored by R.E. Slaughter
This map shows the geographic impact of R.E. Slaughter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.E. Slaughter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.E. Slaughter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R.E. Slaughter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.E. Slaughter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.E. Slaughter. The network helps show where R.E. Slaughter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside R.E. Slaughter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Effectiveness of Web-Based vs. Non-Web-Based Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Change Outcomes Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 784 |
| 2 | The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. Hit paper breakdown → | 1998 | 704 |
| 3 | 2004 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 0 |
About R.E. Slaughter
R.E. Slaughter is a scholar working on Communication, Oncology, Applied Psychology, Education and Infectious Diseases, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper) and Cancer survivorship and care (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (183 citations), Oncology (362 citations), General Health Professions (312 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (140 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (138 citations). R.E. Slaughter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William L. Holzemer, Carmen J. Portillo, Dean Wantland, Eva McGhee, Barbara F. Piper, M. Dodd, Marisa C. Weiss, Steven M. Paul, Suzanne L. Dibble and Fang‐yu Chou. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Nursing Research, Journal of Cancer Education, Journal of Pediatric Health Care and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.