R.E. Slaughter

1.9k citations
6 papers · 1.6k · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Digital Mental Health Interventions
    • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Oncology top 5%
    • Cancer survivorship and care

Papers in

R.E. Slaughter

5 papers receiving 1.5k citations

R.E. Slaughter's Hit Papers

The Effectiveness of Web-Based vs. Non-Web-Based Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Behavioral Change Outcomes 2004 · 785 citations
7850+7+14Years since publication250500750

Peers

R.E. Slaughter
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Applied Psychology 191
  • Oncology 467
  • General Health Professions 409
  • Pharmacy 51
  • Human-Computer Interaction 39
Replace Katie A. Devine with:
Katie A. Devine United States
Dori Pekmezi United States
Diane M. Von Ah United States
Ingrid Müller United Kingdom
Rebecca Helen Lehto United States
Maria João Figueiras Portugal
Christina Bode Netherlands
Cindy L. Carmack United States
Rebecca J. Beeken United Kingdom
Jackie A. Sturt United Kingdom
R.E. Slaughter relative to Katie A. Devine United States Katie A. Devine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.3×
Katie A. Devine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.E. Slaughter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.E. Slaughter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.E. Slaughter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.E. Slaughter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.E. Slaughter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.E. Slaughter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.E. Slaughter. The network helps show where R.E. Slaughter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside R.E. Slaughter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.E. Slaughter Line = papers co-authored together R.E. Slaughter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown

About R.E. Slaughter

R.E. Slaughter is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Oncology, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Nursing care and research (1 paper), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (1 paper), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (1 paper), Nursing Roles and Practices (1 paper), Digital literacy in education (1 paper) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (191 citations), Oncology (467 citations), General Health Professions (409 citations), Pharmacy (51 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (39 citations). R.E. Slaughter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Carmen J. Portillo, William L. Holzemer, Eva M. McGhee, Dean J. Wantland, Steven M. Paul, Barbara F. Piper, Marilyn J. Dodd, Marisa C. Weiss, Suzanne L. Dibble and Marylin J. Dodd. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Nursing Research, Journal of Pediatric Health Care, Journal of Cancer Education and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact